YOUTH TREATED UNEQUALLY IN FLINT MI
It's like deja vu all over again[3]
_______________
Good Morning Flint! 07/24/08
by Terry Bankert
http://goodmorningflint.blogspot.com/
Melee Chat at:
http://flinttalk.com/viewtopic.php?p=32733#32733
________________
CITY OF FLINT CODE
31-12 DISORDERLY CONDUCT AND DISORDERLY PERSONS.
A person is a disorderly person if the person does any of the following:
(n) For the purposes of this section, PUBLIC PLACE means any street, alley, park, government- owned or government-controlled building, common hallway or public room of any dwelling greater than two units, or any other place to which the public has lawful access, as well as any motor vehicle used to provide public transportation. Masculine pronouns in this section shall be construed to include both male and female persons.[9]
(o) Intentionally makes or causes to be made any open exposure of the human male or female genitals, pubic area, buttocks or female breast in any street, alley, park, sidewalk, public building, school or building open to or frequented by the public or any other place that is open to the public view or to which the public has access.[9]
Unequal treatment is what Nayyirah Shariff fears most from Flint's crackdown on saggy pants.[1] A question asked at a recent Flint community meeting was are people were a certain style of clothing which does not violate the law being unfairly targeted? My answer is yes.[trb]
Fashion is part of a freedom of expression. We don't always like what other people are saying, but there you have it. Unless a young man is actually showing his, um, "nether regions," arresting or searching him could easily be construed as harassment. And unless they start jailing suburbanite teeny bobbers with visible thongs, this is just unfair.[3] This ceriminal enforcement reeks of disparity and abuse of power.[trb]
This is not about saggy pants. This is about criminalizing black youth..." one Flint resident said.[8]
FLINT CITIZENS MET AT A MEETING ORGANIZED BY YOUNG PEOPLE TARGETED
The meeting at Red Ink Studios, 101 S. Burton St., ...(included)... members of the Flint Chapter of the National Hip Hop Political Convention and RAISE IT UP! Youth Arts and Awareness. Dicks and members of the American Civil Liberties Union have been invited. [2] Also Present was a member of ACORN[trb] I attended this meeting there were over 100 people.present.[trb]
"Flint police are attacking the black community and trying to get them off the streets," said another resident who attended the meeting.[6] The police chief in video was stopping young people fully covered lifting their shirts to see if under wear rise above their pants under their shirt after a pat down search. Do you think this is right?[trb]
WHAT IS SAGGYING
Some people call it a fad. But for the city of Flint, Mich., that urban style known as 'sagging' is now a criminal offense.[4] I bet the teen agersa who would not have saggyed will now start.[trb]
The issue at hand is "sagging." It's the tacky trend of young men wearing their pants super low and flashing their boxers or less, in the unfortunate event they've gone commando. I, personally, hate the style as, from time to time, it brings out the old biddy in me ("Would you look at how low his pants are? Why -- there is just no need for that. Someone should tell him to pull those up.")[3]
EVERY GENERATION TO PROVED INDEPENDENCE DEVELOPS THEIR OWN CULTURE AND STYLE
It's 90 degrees in downtown Flint Mich., and Jayson Miguel is shirtless, in a pair of gray sweatpants. He's hanging out, minding his own business—and breaking the law. It's not that he's loitering (he's on his way to meet a friend). It's his pants: they're hanging off his hips, below his butt to reveal a pair of gray boxer shorts. "I've been sagging since the fourth grade," the 28-year-old says. "I'll be sagging when I'm old and gray."[4]
WHERE DID SAGGYING COME FROM
The origins of sagging may be what's motivating Dicks. Long popular with the hip-hop set, sagging is in part a relic of prison culture: inmates sagged because they weren't allowed belts. To some, the style references a gangster lifestyle—a symbol of disrespect for authority. "I don't understand why parents let their kids out of their sight like that," said 81-year-old Minnie Boyd (no relation to Todd Boyd), shaking her head as she exited a Flint hair salon. "Who in the world wants to see a butt in public?"[4]
But sagging's origins came partly out of practicality, too. In the 1980s, long before labels like Sean Jean and Rocawear catered to black men, the jeans of popular designers like Tommy Hilfiger were made too narrow for the black male body, says Professor Boyd of USC. So people started buying jeans two or three sizes too big, and—voila!—a style was born. Even Miguel says his sagging was a product of necessity: his mom couldn't always afford new clothes, so he'd inherit oversize hand-me-downs from his older brother. "Of course they were too big," he says.[4]
Dicks said wearing pants below the waist is a crime -- a violation of the city's disorderly conduct ordinance -- and can give police probable cause to search saggers for other crimes, such as weapon or drug possession. He said exposing the buttocks is indecent exposure.[5] This police chief new to the job in a department and city flooded with bad news and a rising crime rate was looking for good press. Unfairly imposing an ambiguos city ordiance wrongfully interpreted and intentionalyy targeted to profiled young people who were thought to have no vocal coalition to defend them seem to be an easy shot for the chief. Wrong![trb]
Both crimes are misdemeanors punishable by 93 days to a year in jail and fines up to $500, Dicks said.[5] Lets just more kids a criminal record in Flint MI seems to be the results of the Dicks initiative.[trb]
IN THE CITY OF FLINT, HIGH CRIME, FINANCIAL CRISIS, LAYING OFF POLICE OFFICERS AND CLOSING THE CITY JAIL, WHY IS SAGGYING IMPORTANT?
Critics also say the Flint police department has bigger issues to worry about. A 2007 report by Congressional Quarterly ranked the city (population 120,000) the third most dangerous in America. It recently laid off 48 officers and closed the city jail because of budget constraints. With a climate like that, why allocate resources to a bunch of kids who have an aversion to belts? "Clearly there are more important things going on in Flint," says Todd Boyd a cultural critic at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles.[4]
TARGETING BLACK YOUTH FOR RANDOM SEARCH... NOW THERE'S PROGRESS
"It seems like you're targeting youth," the 32-year-old Flint resident said Wednesday night during a community forum, noting she disagrees with Police Chief David Dicks' decision to start charging those with sagging pants with disorderly conduct or indecent exposure.[1]
GOOD PEOPLE BEST OF INTENTION HORRIBLE OUTCOMES
But, broken ALERT, hating bad fashion and punishing people for bad fashion are two different beasts. The proposed treatment of the "saggers" is about as appealing as seeing a young man's boxered butt walking down the sidewalk.[3]
"Don't they have something better to do than roll around the streets telling us what to wear and how to wear it," 15 year old, Donovon Cooley said.[8]
FLINT CHIEF OF POLICE ABSCONDED AND IS NON SHOW AT FLINT CITIZEN FORUM
"It's not the community's morals. I think he's kind of out of touch," she said of the chief.[1]
"But for David Dicks, Flint's new police chief, it's a national nuisance. Dicks has ordered his officers to start arresting 'saggers,' as some aficionados of this sartorial style call themselves, on sight, threatening them with jail time and hefty fines for a fad he calls 'immoral self expression.' He later told a local paper the style could give officers probable cause to search saggers."[3]
POLICE CHIEF HAD SUPPORTERS WHO WANTED TO SPEAK TO HIM
Shariff's views were echoed by many of the dozens of people at a community forum at Red Ink Studios in Flint -- but not by everyone.[1]
There has been a tidal-wave of fallout since Flint Police Chief David Dicks said he was cracking down on saggy pants. [6]
It has put Flint in the national spotlight, and at odds with the American Civil Liberties Union. Some people said the ability to sag one’s pants is freedom of speech and expression, but other said its just indecent.[6]
FLINT RESIDENT SUPPORTS CRACKDOWN ON CRACK
Lovie Giles, an eighth-grade counselor, said children need guidance, and their decision to wear saggy pants is more about peer pressure and maturity than about self-expression. She supports the crackdown, which could result in fines or jail time for offenders.[1]
"I think that children should not dictate what they can and cannot do," she said. "Parents need to set the tone for children."[1]
"if showing your undies and buttocks is gonna be the next generation of dress style we need to put a stop to it we all have rights is very very sickening to see this garbage,so if saggy pants wins a law suit for freedom of rights and speech then we can sue them for indecent exposure i really think they either wet their pants or filled them with festis and forgot to change we need to put a stop to it all now [7](comment of diablo)
IF THE RIGHT OF SELF EXPRESSION IS LOST IN FLINT, OTHER COMMUNITIES ARE IN AT RISK!
The crackdown has drawn national attention to both Flint and the issue of self-expression through fashion. It also has prompted the ACLU to seek out those targeted by the crackdown for inclusion in a lawsuit against what officials say is a faulty interpretation of city ordinances.[1]
ARE WE SO FRUSTRATED IN OUR INABILITY TO CONTROL OUR CITY FROM CRIMINALS THAT WE ATTACK OUR CHIOLDREN WITH FALASE ACCUSATIONS?
It's a move other municipalities have tried before on a style that's been around for decades. But Dicks, who took over the department on an interim basis last month, has employed a particularly harsh approach—one that some critics are calling downright illegal. So far, Dicks has only issued warnings to saggers, but he's made it clear that anyone with pants below the butt—whether or not they've got boxers underneath—is violating the city's disorderly conduct code, punishable by 93 days to a year in jail and fines of up to $500. "Everybody's talking about it," says Tonio Watkins, 18, a local high-school student. "I don't like what they're doing. I've been dressing like this my whole life."[4]
The suburban Chicago village of Lynwood, Ill., passed an ordinance last week that states people caught exposing three inches or more of their underwear will be fined $35.[5]
WAS IT DISRESPECT OR POLITICAL, WHY WAS THE CHIEF NOT PRESENT
Despite an invitation to the event, Dicks did not attend.[1]
SAGGING HAS CAUGHT THE NATIONS ATTENTION
Last year, city officials in Atlanta, Ga., started making laws about what people can and cannot wear. This summer, Flint -- or at least the police chief -- is trying to do the SAME.[3] If any saggers are interested I will sponsor a sagging fashion show but you will have to organize it. Most of us do not really kn ow what sagging is.[trb]
ACLU TO THE RESCUE
The local chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union doesn't like it, either—and has given Dicks an ultimatum: stop the policy or face a court battle. They say Dicks is taking the law into his own hands, and violating citizens' freedom of expression in the process. Sagging to show boxer shorts doesn't even violate the city's conduct policy, they say—which states a person must have "open exposure" of the "genitals, pubic area [or] buttocks" to be considered disorderly. "Under no stretch of the imagination does wearing saggy pants that reveal the top of one's boxer shorts violate the Flint disorderly conduct ordinance," says attorney Greg Gibbs, the president of the Flint chapter of the ACLU. "This man has basically taken his personal dislike of a style of dress and made it a violation of criminal law." Gibbs says the chapter will act after Monday if Dicks doesn't change the policy. [4]
With Flint Police Chief David Dicks refusing to back down from his anti-saggy-pants policy, the ACLU is asking people to come forward for a possible lawsuit.[5]
Like the electoral college, the ACLU has long worn out its usefulness. I'm fed up with them comming up with excuses for humanity to behave brainlessly. I believe the pants below the butt thing repulsive and I have yet to hear anybody say it's attractive or says anything to them but "nasty, dirty, repulsive, stupid, etc." I know law enforcement love it when baggy pants run. Makes it easier to nab the scum and hide them in a prison so decent society does'nt have to look at their filthy underwear. [6](-comment of rahrah)
HAVE YOU BEEN APPROACHED BY THE FLINT POLICE ABOUT-"SAGGING PANTS"[10]
The police may be violating your rights when they stop you, search or threaten to charge you with " indecent exposure" just because you are wearing sagging pants. As long as your " buttocks, genitals and "pubic area" are not "openly exposed" you are not committing a crime. [10]
If a police officer has approached you because of the way you wear your pants, or you have seen the police stop someone because of the way they wear their pants we need to hear from you.[10]
Call the ACLU Police Acountability Hotline (313) 578-6831[10]
You have a right to complain directly to the Flint Police Chief, Flint Police Internal affairs, The Mayor of Flint, The Flint City Council and the Flint Ombudsman. For any youth interested I am willing to help you with organizing for your contact with these governmental entities.[trb]
A CROSS SECTION OF FLINT WAS PRESENT AT THIS RED INK EVENT ,THANK YOU RED INK
The forum, organized by youth and community groups, was billed as a dialogue, not a debate. It brought together people from a range of professions, young and old, white and black.[1]
JUST GIVE ME A LITTLE RESPECT SAY THE SAGGERS THAT ARE DECENT
While many of those who oppose saggy pants focused on issues of respect and decency, those opposing the crackdown said the city should focus its limited resources on more serious crimes.[1]
Probable cause? Fines? Jail time? I know this is cliche, but doesn't the police chief of Flint have bigger FISH to fry? Like, say, catching actual criminals and solving real crimes?[3]
In the meantime, residents like Miguel—who, at 6-foot-3, wears a size 3XL in sweatpants—are just plain confused. Sagging has been around for decades. Why outlaw it now? "I think it's an opportunity to harass, to be honest," says Miguel. The ACLU worries about that, too: it's no secret sagging is a style long popular with men of color. Last week, a Flint police officer called into a local radio station to say that officers were already using the policy as a way to profile minorities. (Chief Dicks is himself African-American.)[4]
"We are not in favor of people exposing indecently, they don't have a right to do that," Gibbs says. "But that's not what Chief Dicks is doing here. He's going after a style not after indecent composure."[8]
Today, Miguel sags because it's "cool, hip"—but insists it's not a commentary on his way of life. "Hip-hop has been around for a long time now, and there are some things about the culture that have just become commonplace," says professor Boyd. "You're not making a big statement by sagging." As Miguel puts it: "It's just a style, man." And hopefully not a criminal offense.[4]
—end
Posted here by Terry Bankert
–where did this stuff come from
[1]
Freep.com
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080724/NEWS06/807240428
[2]
Freep.com
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080723/NEWS06/80723006/1008
[3]
Mlive.com
http://blog.mlive.com/newblack/2008/07/flint_fashion_police_the_no_sa.html
[4]
Newsweek
http://www.newsweek.com/id/146803
[5]
Freep.com
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080721/NEWS06/80721061/&imw=Y
[6]
WJRT
http://abclocal.go.com/wjrt/story?section=news/local&id=6283079
[7]
WNEM
http://www.wnem.com/news/16962293/detail.html
[8]
NBC 25
http://www.weyi.com/news/news_story.aspx?id=163897
[9]
City of Flint
http://www.ci.flint.mi.us/
[10]
ACLU FLYER distributed at Red Ink meeting see:
http://www.aclumich.org/
[trb]
Comments of Terry Bankert to include unattributed cap headlines.
http://attorneybankert.com/
***************
TERRY BANKERT WILL ASSIST ANY VICTEMS OF THE DISCRIMINATORY SAGGYING CRACKDOWN TO PROTEST ..not litigate go to ACLU for that...We will take this issue publicly to the powers to be in the City of Flint. CALL 235-1970. area code 810.
or email to ATTORNEYBANKERT@YAHOO.COM
***************
= = = = = FLINT PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION
_________
LOCAL FLINT AREA GASOLINE PRICES
http://abclocal.go.com/wjrt/feature?section=resources/traffic&id=5767026
FAMILY LAW QUESTIONS, DIVORCE, CUSTODY, SUPPORT AND PARENTING TIME http://attorneybankert.com/
= = = = = YOU ARE INVITED TO JOIN A FLINT NETWORK ON FACE BOOK http://www.facebook.com/people/Terry_Bankert/645845362
= = = = = FOR PRESIDENT :
BEST CHOICE- http://www.barackobama.com/splash/donate/donate.html
WORST CHOICE- http://howinsaneisjohnmccain.blogspot.com/
__________
secret code
69278/16101
Thursday, July 24, 2008
Black youth targeted for profiled stop and frisk under pretext of indeceny ordinance!
Saturday, July 19, 2008
NATIONAL HEALTH CARE, BOY WE NEED IT NOW!
NATIONAL HEALTH CARE, CAN WE AFFORD NOT TO HAVE IT?
_______________
Good Morning Flint! 07/19/08
by Terry Bankert http://goodmorningflint.blogspot.com/
Chat at:
http://www.flinttalk.com/viewtopic.php?p=32380#32380
________________
Today Sat 7/18/08 on WFLT 1420 AM radio 9:00 am till 9:30 my guest will be Maryion Lee to talk about Health care in the United States.
This is a call in program 1-810-239-5733.
I asked her for several suggested questions and background information about herself. You are invited to call in-.trb --
Hello Terry,
I hope this is what you wanted. Please feel free to make suggestions. In the United States, Medicare is highly supported by the people as one of the most successful social programs in the United States.
Medicare has its 43 rd birthday on July 30 so it is opportune for us to discuss Congressman John Conyers, Jr.'s bill, HR 676, The United States Health Insurance Act. HR 676 is described as an improved and expanded Medicare Healthcare Coverage for everyone in the country.It will establish universal healthcare insurance program with single payer financing.
1. Will you give a brief summary of the HR 676?
2. The detractors of this bill charge that it will be too costly, reduce quality of care, deter advancement through research, cause a rationing of care, and is socialism. How do you respond to these charges?
3.At this time the nation is experiencing an economic crisis -some people believe that it compares to the upheaval immediately after World War II and some even predict that it will continue and will compare with conditions of the Great Depression of the Thirties. Why would it benefit the United States to take on the issue of healthcare financing at this time?
4.Since I have asked questions that could be attributed to the HR 676 detractors, I want to give you a chance to add anything that might have been missed in our prior conversation that causes you and others to be so committed to HR 676?
5. How can people get involved with supporting HR 676?
About me. B.A. and Masters, plus -University of Michigan Retired Flint Teacher, owner of several small businesses, financial representative Served on Flushing Board of Education, Genesee Economic Development Corporation, and Genesee County Board of Commissioners. Married to Sheridan Lee, my business and interest partner, as well as my life partner Three children, their partners, and four grandchildren Democratic Progressive Caucus Chair and co founder with my husband,Sheridan The quality of healthcare and the financing of care has been a concern in my life,all of my life. -- end
-- Previous post to Flint Talk on this issue. http://flinttalk.com/viewtopic.php?p=30066#30066
--- I will be at the following meeting later in the day and will post my observations.-trb
Town Hall Meeting Non-Partisan Portion of the Ballot
The Genesee County Democratic Party along with The Genesee County Democratic Black Caucus invite you to a Town Hall Meeting
Saturday, July 19, 2008 11:00 AM to 12:30 PM
Morningstar Missionary Baptist Church
Rev. E. L. Gurley, Pastor 2120 N. Saginaw Street (near Hamilton St.)
FREE ADMISSION Guest Speaker is Detroit's own, Judge Deborah Thomas, Candidate for Michigan Supreme Court (Let's remove Cliff Taylor) Facilitator: Danny Craig, Chair - Michigan Democratic Black Caucus
Continental Breakfast Served
Please feel free to bring a friend.
Gerri Hall - Genesee County Democratic Black Caucus
Ron Duncan - Genesee County Democratic Party
= = = = = FLINT PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION
local gasoline prices http://abclocal.go.com/wjrt/feature?section=resources/traffic&id=5767026 FAMILY LAW QUESTIONS, DIVORCE, CUSTODY, SUPPORT AND PARENTING TIME http://attorneybankert.com/ = = = = =
68644/16006
Friday, July 18, 2008
MIDDLE CLASS UNDER ATTACK, GORE HAS AN ANSWER...
SOLVE THE ENERGY CRISIS OR DIE, ALBERT GORES THEME
_____
Good Morning Flint! 07/18/08 by Terry Bankert
http://goodmorningflint.blogspot.com/
Chat at:
http://flinttalk.com/viewtopic.php?p=32328
_____
*****
With crisis , (energy, food, economic stability),and change swirling around us, how do we sort out the serious alternatives from the poorly thought out or presented crap we are fed daily by politicians and the media?
"The survival of the United States of America as we know it is at risk," he ..(Albert Gore)...said in a midday speech to a friendly crowd of mostly young supporters in Washington. "And even more — if more should be required — the future of human civilization is at stake."[2]
In the end its about people. Who leads, survives, and what they say. To be a responsible citizen you have to believe in something or some person and work to cause change. The option is to be couch potato cattle just waiting for the slaughter while complaining. I believe in Albert Gore and the need in this country for alternative fuels. Issues worth fighting for. How about you? The following are from 6 articles on the Gore environmental breaking news.- Terry Bankert
Complete morphed article with citations at
http://goodmorningflint.blogspot.com/
*****
GORE, A REAL LEADER WITH ISSUES THAT AFFECT YOUR LIVES
Gore called for the kind of concerted national effort that enabled Americans to walk on the moon 39 years ago, just eight years after President John F. Kennedy set that goal.[3]
Like a modern Jeremiah, Mr. Gore called down thunder to justify the spending of trillions of dollars to remake the American power system, a plan fraught with technological and political challenges that goes far beyond the changes recently debated in Congress and by world leaders.[5]
Our communities must engage in the environmental debate. Politicans want to survive in 2 to 4 years cycles. Argue their demise if energy options are not developed by this country, they will listen.
It sounds like a typical, idealistic Al Gore idea. But two things about this proposal merit attention. It points a country that uses too much energy down the right path. And Gore is showing that being environmentally responsible is economically sensible. [6]
Voters say they hate gimmicks and insist they want bold solutions. Well, Gore is testing that proposition. He says he wants to "expand the political space" for those actually running for office. Will they take the opening? [6]
10 YEAR PLAN : CUT OUR RELIANCE ON OIL, REPLACE IT WITH ELECTRICITY
Former Vice President Al Gore, seeking to shake up an energy debate that is focused mostly on drilling, challenged the United States to shift its entire electricity sector to carbon-free wind, solar and geothermal power within 10 years, and use that power to fuel a new fleet of electric vehicles.[1]
Former Vice President Al Gore urged....that drastic steps are needed to avoid a global economic and ecological cataclysm.[2]
LEADERS CHALLENGE , THEY MUST. IF THEY DO NOT TAKE THEM OUT, ELECTORALY
The goal is the most ambitious energy plan by a major U.S. political figure - and one many energy experts say is unrealistic. Gore insists the only real obstacle is the reluctance of America's leaders to seek bold solutions to high energy prices and global warming. He likened his challenge to President John F. Kennedy's 1961 call to put a man on the moon.[1]
AN ELECTRIC NATION IS ACHIEVABLE, AFFORDABLE AND TRANSFORMATIVE
"This goal is achievable, affordable and transformative," Gore told more than 1,000 cheering supporters at the Daughters of the American Revolution Constitution Hall in Washington. "It represents a challenge to all Americans in every walk of life: to our political leaders, entrepreneurs, innovators, engineers and to every citizen."[1]
Gore acknowledged that his plan would, at least initially, drive energy prices higher. But he proposed a payroll tax cut to offset higher prices for fuel and electricity.[2]
OUR PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES MUST ENTER THE ELECTRIC DEBATE
Gore is seeking to pressure the presidential candidates and Congress, which is in the middle of a fierce debate on energy policy. He said he has spoken to both Republican Sen. John McCain and Democratic Sen. Barack Obama about his ideas. Obama issued a statement Thursday saying he strongly agrees with Gore's goal.[1]
Gore, who shared the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007 for his environmental advocacy, said in an interview that he hoped to raise the alarm so that the next president, whether Sen. Barack Obama or Sen. John McCain, can rally Congress and the nation to action. He disavowed any interest in returning to elective office.[2]
New jobs, safer world [1]
"It's a strategy that will create millions of new jobs that pay well and cannot be outsourced, and one that will leave our children a world that is cleaner and safer," Obama said. [1]
MCCAIN , OBAMA BELIEVE GORE
Gore's ecumenical approach is intentional; he said to solve such a huge, complex issue as climate change, political leaders must move beyond partisan divisions.[3]
McCain said that while he and Gore might disagree on some aspects of climate change, he supports the goals Gore outlined for developing wind and solar. "If the vice president says it's doable, I believe it's doable," McCain said.[1]
WE MUST MOVE BEYOND PARTISAN DIVISIONS
Gore's ecumenical approach is intentional; he said to solve such a huge, complex issue as climate change, political leaders must move beyond partisan divisions.[3]
Obama issued a statement saying he strongly agrees with Gore that "we cannot drill our way to energy independence, but must fast-track investments in renewable sources of energy like solar power, wind power, and advanced biofuels, and those are the investments I will make as president."[3]
"I see my role as enlarging the political space in which Senator Obama or Senator McCain can confront this issue as president next year," Mr. Gore said.[5]
THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY MUST MAKE ELECTRIC ENERGY A PRIORITY
Separately, Democratic leaders are under pressure from environmentalists to curb the U.S. consumption of fossil fuels, amid new warnings about climate change's effects. A government report published on Thursday said climate change "is very likely to accentuate the disparities already evident in the American health-care system," with expected health effects -- such as heat-related illnesses and the spread of certain diseases -- likely to fall disproportionately on the poor, elderly, disabled and uninsured[4]
Democrats should be concerned about where they are on the gas-price issue right now, and the party's own strategists are worried that its response so far is inadequate. [6]
U.S. MUST RESTRUCTURE ITS ELECTRICAL SECTOR
Gore's challenge would require a massive restructuring of America's electricity sector. The country currently relies on coal for about half of its electric power - 49 percent - followed by natural gas (22 percent) nuclear (19 percent) and hydropower (6 percent), according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Renewable power accounts for 2.5 percent, although it's growing rapidly in many states, especially California.[1]
Gore's proposal would represent a significant shift in where the United States gets its power. In 2005, the United States produced nearly 3.7 billion kilowatt hours of electricity, with coal providing slightly more than half of that energy, according to government statistics. Nuclear power accounted for 21 percent, natural gas 15 percent and renewable sources, including wind and solar, about 9 percent.[3]
INDUSTRY SPOKESPERSON SAYS IT CANNOT BE DONE IN 10 YEARS
Jim Owen, a spokesman for the Edison Electric Institute, which represents investor-owned utilities that produce 70 percent of the nation's power, said his group supports Gore's call for more electric vehicles and a major increase in wind, solar and geothermal. But Owen said there's no way renewables could meet all the country's energy needs in 10 years.[1]
Robbie Diamond, president of Securing America's Future Energy, a bipartisan think tank, said that weaning the nation away from fossil fuels - coal, oil, and natural gas - can't be done in a decade. "The country is not going to be able to go cold turkey," Diamond said. "We have hundreds of years of infrastructure with trillions of dollars of investment that is not simply going to be made obsolete."[3]
ELECTRIC INDUSTRY ARGUES FOR MORE NUCLEAR
"We cannot do the job with renewables and energy efficiency alone," he said. "We have to have a balanced energy portfolio that includes all those things in even higher percentages, but also has to include nuclear. And we frankly think that nuclear should be increased."[1]
THE U.S. FACES THREE CRISES ,TODAY.
Gore, the Nobel Peace Prize winner and 2000 Democratic presidential candidate, presented his challenge as a solution to three overlapping crises: an economic crisis fueled by rising energy prices; a global climate crisis; and a national security crisis fed by instability in the Middle East, the largest source of the world's oil supply.[1]
WE ARE BORROWING MONEY FROM CHINA TO BUY OIL
"We're borrowing money from China to buy oil from the Persian Gulf to burn it in ways that destroy the planet," he said. "Every bit of that's got to change."[1]
THE COST OF SOLAR CELLS IS DROPPING
Gore said as the prices of oil and coal have increased, wind and solar have become more economically competitive. He noted that the price of the specialized silicon used to make solar cells fell from $300 per kilogram to as low as $50 per kilogram recently. [1]
OUR ELECTRIC GRID MUST BE IMPROVED
But Gore acknowledged that there are barriers to reaching his goal. The nation's electric grid is still not sufficiently developed to move solar power from sunny states out West or wind power from windy states to power-hungry markets, he said.[1]
AUTOMAKERS SHOULD SHIFT TO ELECTRIC HYBRIDS
A centerpiece of Gore's plan would be to help beleaguered U.S. automakers produce a new national fleet of plug-in electric vehicles. Foreign competitors, especially Toyota, have taken a lead in selling fuel-efficient hybrids. Gore said U.S. automakers could regain their edge with new electric cars that can be plugged in at night - saving consumers money while reducing air pollution and U.S. dependence on foreign oil. [1]
PICKENS SAYS ELECTRIC AND NATURAL GAS ARE THE ANSWER
Gore isn't the only one touting a new energy plan focused on renewables. T. Boone Pickens, a Texas oilman who has recently invested heavily in wind, is pushing a plan to use wind power for about 20 percent of the nation's electricity needs, and then use the natural gas that would have gone to power plants for new fuels for cars and trucks.[1]
GORE PROPOSES ECONOMIC INCENTIVES
Gore has previously supported cap-and-trade schemes, which could raise revenue to subsidize renewable projects. But he said Thursday he also likes the idea of cutting the payroll tax and creating a new tax on carbon emissions, which would give a leg up to low-carbon sources.[1]
He said the single most important policy change would be placing a carbon tax on burning oil and coal, with an accompanying reduction in payroll taxes.[3]
Cheers against drilling[1]
Gore drew his loudest cheers from a crowd packed with environmentalists when he denounced efforts, backed by President Bush, McCain and congressional Republicans, to boost oil drilling. Gore said, "It is only a truly dysfunctional system that would buy into the perverse logic that the short-term answer to high gasoline prices is drilling for more oil 10 years from now."[1]
DRILLING IS NOT THE ANSWER
Environmentalists have been disappointed at the recent energy debate, where even some Democrats have backed more drilling as an answer to $4-per-gallon gasoline. Gore's speech could convince Democrats to take a different approach, they said.[1]
Former Vice President Al Gore urged Congress not to overturn a federal ban on offshore drilling and complained that lawmakers are "being stampeded by lobbyists for special interests" eager to lift the moratorium.[4]
WHERE DO WE NEED TO GO, WHO WILL LEAD US
"It's a very aggressive, bold, comprehensive proposal and it's great to challenge the politicians to go where they need to go," said League of Conservation Voters President Gene Karpinski.[1]
Last winter, the House failed to enact legislation to require utilities to produce 15 percent of their electricity from renewable sources by 2020. Last month, supporters could not even get a Senate vote on a climate change plan that would cut greenhouse-gas emissions by nearly 70 percent by 2050.[2]
Gore's core assertion is that the technology for alternative fuels -- wind, solar and geothermal -- is far more advanced than we realize. Pushing that progress further would cut the costs of energy, with Gore insisting that renewables could eventually "give us the equivalent of $1 per gallon gasoline." [6]
A majority of voters," they continue, "believe that coupling an investment in alternative fuels with increased domestic production of oil is preferable to alternative fuel investment combined with energy conservation alone." [6]
–
[1]
SFGate
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/07/18/MN2711QRVL.DTL
[2]
Star Telegrahm
http://www.star-telegram.com/869/story/766574.html
[3]
Boston.com
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/07/18/gore_sets_energy_goal_for_2018/
[4]
Wall Street Journal
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121633985301764011.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
[5]
The New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/18/washington/18gore.html?hp
[6]
The Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/17/AR2008071701840.html
[TRB]
Unattributed comments and CAP headlines are those of Terry Bankert
http://attorneybankert.com/
= = = = = FLINT PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION local gasoline prices http://abclocal.go.com/wjrt/feature?section=resources/traffic&id=5767026
FAMILY LAW QUESTIONS, DIVORCE, CUSTODY, SUPPORT AND PARENTING TIME http://attorneybankert.com/
= = = = =
68543/15959