GOOD MORNING FLINT!
By Terry Bankert, 3/8/08
http://attorneybankert.com/
Posted First to Blogging for Michigan
http://www.bloggingformichigan.com/
UPDATE ON “UNITE HERE” VOTE, some will be left here and others will unite elsewhere, possibly SEIU.
I found little coverage for possibly the most important vote in organized big labor this year. I will run with the press release today. I have archives parked at-
http://americandailynews.wordpress.com/
UNITE WILL TAKE THEIR MONEY AND LEAVE THE UNION.
15 UNITE HERE Joint Boards Vote to Disaffiliate from the International Union
NEW YORK, March 7 /PRNewswire/ -- Thousands of union members, representing 150,000 workers, gathered today to vote on disaffiliation from the UNITE HERE International Union. Delegates and elected leaders represent workers in the apparel, textile, laundry, food service and hospitality industries, including nearly 40,000 members of the former HERE.
"This vote was an important step that takes our union in the right direction," said Edgar Romney, Manager of the New York Metropolitan Area Joint Board. "Our joint board's elected leaders voted to end our affiliation with UNITE HERE. In so doing, we can move ahead toward forming a new union - one that better serves its members and one that empowers those that do not yet have a union."
"Our merger with the former HERE was a total failure. Their way of operating was authoritarian, secretive, and undemocratic. John Wilhelm and his faction worked to disenfranchise the workers on the UNITE side of the union and gain control of the resources those workers helped to build," said Cristina Vazquez, Manager of the Western States Regional Joint Board.
"For years, our shop was neglected and our contracts weren't negotiated properly. Since we affiliated with the PA Joint Board, all that has changed. Our members are now organized and involved and together we won our best contract ever. We need to protect what we have achieved and keep moving forward," said Joyce Gromley, a member of Aramark Local 57, based in Pittsburgh.
"I want to get back to what we should be doing. We want to work as hard as we possibly can to ensure that our members get good contracts that put food on the table. We also want to be a part of the movement to organize more workers than ever before and bring the benefits of union membership to any worker who seeks them. Today is part of a much larger effort to grow and empower the middle class," said Lynne Fox, Manager of the Philadelphia Joint Board.
Today's vote was the largest and broadest in the union's history, involving workers across the nation. The process is democratic, and embodies the spirit of what the labor movement is working towards -- giving workers a bigger voice in choosing their destinies.
"Our members deserve a union that's better than the one they have been in for the past five years. We have a moment - right now - to move in a new direction. We can fight for good wages and a secure retirement. We can fight for safe workplaces. And we will work with the Obama administration, the new Congress, and others to pass the Employee Free Choice Act and other legislation that helps working people," said Romney.
SOURCE New York Metropolitan Joint Board SEE
http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/03-07-2009/0004984605&EDATE=
Posted Here By Terry Bankert 3/8/09
Consider continuing this discussion on my Face Book
http://www.facebook.com/people/Terry-Bankert/645845362
Sunday, March 8, 2009
De- UNITE and no longer HERE
Saturday, March 7, 2009
Stand together or fall alone.
GOOD MORNING FLINT!
By Terry Bankert, 3/9/08
http://attorneybankert.com/
Posted First to Blogging for Michigan
http://www.bloggingformichigan.com/
I am still following the Unite Hereiu struggle.
The time needs of a law practice came home to roost last week. In Flint its good to be busy. Thank you to those who have offered leads and interviews, I will follow up. My wife has given me permission to go to the Chicago Convention of Unite Hereiu. I sense a good a street fight. Credentials and access to leadership will be sought.
I have a lot of material but it is difficult to keep straight who is with Raynor and who is with Wilhelm. Maybe that does not matter. What is important to me is the Union struggle to adapt of a large social institution with a half a million members and a half a billion of dollars in assets. This struggle to adapt is being played out in an infinite number of ways from Unions , Wall Street, the White House and your house.
If there is no struggle there is no progress...this struggle may be a moral one, or it may be a physical one, and it may be both moral and physical, but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without demand.It never did and it never will. Find out what people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them and these will be continued until resisted with either words or blows or both. By Fredrick Douglas.[3]
From: Bruce Raynor, General President
March 5 at 2:59pm ,
MEMORANDUM,
To: UNITE HERE ,
Re: Statement on recent judicial decisions on disaffiliation votes by UNITE HERE locals and joint boards [1]
AROUND THE COUNTRY THE LOCALS OR JOINT BOARDS ARE MEETINGThis week, two federal judges have signaled their support for union democracy by allowing several UNITE HERE joint boards and locals representing more than 150,000 workers throughout the U.S. and Canada to hold votes of rank and file leaders on the question of whether or not to disaffiliate with our international union. [1]
Raynor is UNITE has the money and the locals, Wilhelm is HERE and has the membership numbers and the joint boards. HERE is spending UNITES money. UNITE did not do a good job of protecting themselves in the merger. All are break offs from the AFL-CIO.Raynor stands to be tossed out at the Chigago Convention because he does not have the votes. Can you imagine that.
President Wilhelm tried to restrain the Joint Boards from voting and threatened them with losing their charters for even allowing votes on disaffiliation. One federal judge refused to block the voting and after questioning from another federal judge, the HERE faction agreed not to attempt to revoke the charters of Joint Boards that held votes. [1]
This week Mr. Wilhelm claimed that the Chicago Midwest Joint Board had admitted intentional wrongdoing in its attempts to represent Local 24 workers. I strongly dispute his assessment of the actions taken by the Joint Board. The truth is that the Joint Board's new state director sent letters to employers instructing that Local 24 representatives should be dealt with in contract administration and dues collection WHILE the case of who should represent the workers makes its way through court. The Joint Board sent these letters because many employers were trying to use the internal conflict as an excuse to ignore the workers' union altogether.[2]
As I said earlier this week, the merger that created UNITE HERE needs to come to an end, and I still hope that we can forge a path to the future based on a set of negotiations that works out what is best for all of our members. But clearly many of our local leaders have no faith that is possible. [1]
Mr. Wilhelm's characterizing a "major push back" from members of Local 24 is misleading, if not dishonest. There has been no vote yet of Local 24 members to decide their own destiny. I, as many other members, welcomed the presence of the Joint Board. It has been proven that 24 is a local in crisis; we struggled with no representation in contract negotiations or enforcement and I personally never got phone calls returned. Stories about workers paying for insurance they didn't receive (Metropolitan Hotel), about getting cussed out by reps in front of bosses (Sinbad's Restaurant), reps on the take from bosses (Riverside Hotel), contracts being settled with no worker participation (multiple), about white salts running against Black members for elected leadership positions and long-term members being disenfranchised from local elections (casino and airport divisions) show that there are deep problems in Local 24. [2]
Riverside Hotel Democratic Party protest confronting the Union guy standing with management, Daughtery caught on my video.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/30366181@N05/sets/72157614264662984/show/
Joint Board staff did not attempt to shut elected officers and stewards out of the union offices when Joe Daugherty was removed from appointed position as State Director. All staff were expected to stay and continue their work in the Local. No members who conducted themselves with respect were excluded from the office. Daugherty and his Vegas back-ups chose to polarize the situation by rushing the office, boxing up and even shredding files. Their goal was to have us all prohibited from doing the peoples' work. They told workers they had to "choose a side" and that they wouldn't be represented by 24 if they met with folks sent from Chicago. [2]
Workers in Detroit need a union that works better than Local 24 has, now more than ever. I encourage people to look at the videos below and take with a grain of salt Mr Wilhelm's portrayal of the situation here...Earnest Lemond, Local 24 President, Airport Division [2]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mxl32ZJCUh4&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7S-I8Zo_EE
After review by two federal courts, workers can now take matters into their own hands and are gathering this Saturday in union halls and meeting rooms around the U.S. and Canada to have a frank and difficult debate about the future of their union. I await the results of those votes, and I will follow in the direction they lead.[1]
"We will make you proud of us brothers and sisters if you will give us a hand we need. Help us make our country better and more wholesome. Pull us out of our slough of despond. Teach arrogant grinders of the faces of the poor that there still is a God in Israel and if need be a Jehovah - a God of battles. Do this and on the last great day you will stand as we hope to stand before the great white throne like gentlemen unafraid." Statement from the Pullman Strike. June 15,1884.[3]
Posted Here By Terry Bankert 3/8/09
Consider continuing this discussion on my Face Book
http://www.facebook.com/people/Terry-Bankert/645845362
My radio show today is on alimony.
http://terrybankert.blogspot.com/
-
[1] From a Friend, unverified but looks real to me.
[2]
Forwarded to Bankert by elevin@unitehere.org, From: "Ed Vargas" Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:05:48 -0500,To: Bruce Raynor
[3]
Howard Zinn, Anthony Arnove, "Voices of a People History of the United States, Seven Stories Press NY 2004.
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Bush league rule reversed
GOOD MORNING FLINT!
BY Terry Bankert 3/4/09
http://attorneybankert.com/
Posted first to Blogging for Michigan
http://www.bloggingformichigan.com/frontPage.do
PRESIDENT OBAMA TELLS HIS ADMINISTRATION TO TALK TO SCIENTISTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT BEFORE PUTTING SHOVELS IN THE GROUND.HOW WILL THIS AFFECT THE STIMULUS PROJECTS?
* Obama tells agencies to consult scientists before acting.* Environmentalists praise move to reverse late Bush order.4]
Toward the end of the Bush Era was a scramble to change policies that protect the nation's most at-risk animals and plants. 5]
http://topics.latimes.com/politics/people/barack-obamahttp://topics.latimes.com/politics/people/joe-biden
Obama also announced key changes in implementing the endangered species law TO "help restore the scientific process to its rightful place at the heart of the Endangered Species Act."1]
ENVIRONMENTALIST SAY THIS WILL KEEP THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FROM DESTROYING WILD LIFE HABITAT AND ENDANGERING SPECIES.
WE HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO DO THIS FOR THE PEOPLE WHO WILL FOLLOW US.
/topic/politics/government/national-government/united-states-ORGOV0000001.topicBUSINESS AND INDUSTRY LOBBYIST ARGUE THAT AT THE VERY TIME WE MUST JUMP START OUT ECONOMY THIS POSITION OF THE PRESIDENT WILL SLOW DOWN OR EVEN STOP ROAD BUILDING AND OTHER SHOVEL READY PROJECTS.
"Francesca Grifo of the Union of Concerned Scientists, an activist group, said the switch would help guard against the potential conflicts of interest and lack of expertise that could color decision-making by any agency hoping to press ahead with a particular project. "After years of scientific scandal, the Interior Department and its partner agencies need desperately to regain credibility by making decisions with honesty, clarity and transparency," Grifo said. 3]
MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
Under that interagency process, executive departments and agencies (agencies) contemplating an action that may affect endangered or threatened species have long been required, except in certain limited circumstances, to consult with, and in some circumstances obtain the prior written concurrence of, the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) -- the expert agencies that have the primary responsibility to ensure that the ESA is implemented in accordance with the law. 1]
THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY WAS JUMMPING FOR JOY WHEN THE PAST ADMINISTRATION THROUGH RULE MAKING IGNORED PROTECTING YOUR ENVIRONMENT.
"But William L. Kovacs, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's vice president of environment, technology and regulatory affairs, said that reviving another layer of review "will result in even greater delays to projects -- including stimulus-backed, job-creating projects -- as agencies now grapple with the prospect of lengthy interagency consultations to determine, for instance, if a bridge project in Florida contributes to the melting of Arctic ice. This is such a departure from the spirit and the letter of the Endangered Species Act that we wonder if the law's drafters would even recognize it today." 3]
GEORGE W BUSH CHANGED THAT COOPERATION, OBAMA BROUGHT IT BACK
"An Interior Department decision earlier in Bush's presidency allowed the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management to skip the consultations when setting certain fire management policies. A 2008 government review found that both agencies frequently failed to consider key aspects of the policies' effects on species."2]
WHEN OBAMA PROTECTS THE LAND HE IS PROTECTING OUR CHILDREN ON IT.
"The latest policy shift follows several other administration actions revamping environmental policies, including a reexamination of fuel economy standards and offshore oil drilling; a new review of whether to grant California and other states the right to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions from vehicles; and the endorsement of a new international treaty negotiation on global mercury emissions." 3]
KEY COMMITTE CHAIRMAN APPALUDS OBAMA
"House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Nick J. Rahall II (D-W.Va.), who had been seeking to overturn Bush's endangered species rule through legislation, called the announcement "one more indication that the new administration truly represents change for the better and is committed to the protection of our natural resources and our environment." 3]
GEORGE W BUSH AT THE VERY END OF HIS TERM, THROUGH RULE MAKING SIDED WITH BUSINESS AGAINST THE ENVIRONMENT. THIS SHOWED HIS TRUE CHARACTER OR LACK THEREOF.
"On December 16, 2008, the Departments of the Interior and Commerce issued a joint regulation that modified these longstanding requirements. See 73 Fed. Reg. 76272. This new regulation expands the circumstances in which an agency may determine not to consult with, or obtain the written concurrence of, the FWS or NMFS prior to undertaking an action that may affect threatened or endangered species. But under the new regulation, agencies may continue the previous practice of consulting with, and obtaining the written concurrence of, the FWS and NMFS as a matter of discretion." 1]
WE WILL SELF POLICE SAID THE WOLF TO THE SHEEP.
"Bush's rule change, finalized in December, allowed federal agencies to determine on their own if projects would jeopardize endangered species, instead of consulting with expert biologists, as had been required for the last three decades. It gave agencies the option, if they so chose, of calling on the experts from the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service."2]
LOBBYIST FOR INDUSTRY AND BIG BUSINESS CRY THIS WILL CAUSE MORE RED TAPE.
"Industry lobbyists said Obama's decision Tuesday to mandate the consultations would add "red tape" to infrastructure projects funded by the economic stimulus bill. "This directive throws the brakes on projects," said Bill Kovacs, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's vice president of environment, technology and regulatory affairs."2]
OBAMA WILL SLOW DOWN THE GROWING OF WIND FARMS
Even clean energy plans, such as wind farms, could be slowed down, said Michael Olsen, a former Bush Interior official who now lobbies for energy interest at Bracewell and Giuliani. "It's not just projects that folks would term non-green," he said. "It's the green projects, too."2]
SCOFFERS SPEAK UP
Environmentalists scoffed at those warnings. "This kind of scientific consultation was how the Endangered Species Act worked for 30 years," said Athan Manuel, director of lands protection for the Sierra Club. "So I think that's sour grapes."2]
OBAMA JUST WANTS A RETURN TO WHAT HAS WORKED IN THE PAST AND CALLS FOR WILDLIFE RULEMAKING AND AGENCIES TO BE CAREFUL
"I hereby request the Secretaries of the Interior and Commerce to review the regulation issued on December 16, 2008, and to determine whether to undertake new rulemaking procedures with respect to consultative and concurrence processes that will promote the purposes of the ESA. Until such review is completed, I request the heads of all agencies to exercise their discretion, under the new regulation, to follow the prior longstanding consultation and concurrence practices involving the FWS and NMFS. "1]
BUSH’S LAST MINUET RULE MAKING WAS ILLEGAL
"This is very good news for endangered species," said Andrew Wetzler of the Natural Resources Defense Council. "The regulations that President Bush issued were clearly illegal, and they were bad policy to boot." Michael Bean, director of wildlife programs for the Environmental Defense Fund, said the forced consultation with expert biologists has tempered the ambitions of the Army Corps, the Forest Service, the Bureau of Reclamation and other agencies that "have historically had pretty strong mission drives, which have maybe overwhelmed concerns about species." Consultations have resulted in a variety of measures to preserve species that could be imperiled by government projects, including steps to protect the endangered San Clemente Island loggerhead shrike from the effects of a nearby Navy ship-to-shore live-fire range.2]
ADVOCATES POINT OUT SPECIFIC PROJECTS THAT MUST BE REVISITED
Earthjustice lawyer Janette Brimmer, whose group had challenged the Bush rule in federal district court in California, said she expected that the new administration would reexamine two pending projects: a Bureau of Land Management plan for overseeing Oregon's forests, which was finalized on Dec. 30 and could affect protected species such as the northern spotted owl; and construction of the White Pine coal-fired power plant in Nevada. 3]
INSIDERS TELL THE LOBBYIST NOT TO WORRY
"Administration officials said the move is not likely to trigger broad use of the Endangered Species Act to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions. While the Bush rule specifically prohibited endangered species consultations on the basis of "global processes" such as climate change, an Interior official who asked not to be identified said that under the new policy, such a review would be triggered only if scientific evidence suggested "a causal connection" between emissions from a federal project and its effect on specific imperiled species or an identifiable part of its habitat." 3]
THEY CLAIM TO BRING SCIENCE BACK TO THE EQUATION, WE’LL SEE SAY SOME
"I think the Obama administration now is going to take a step back on these projects. It needs to bring science back into the equation," Brimmer said, adding that her group will not drop its lawsuit until it can assess how the new policy is working. 3]
BIG TIME REPUBLICAN IS BIG TIME TEED OFF.
"Eastern Washington's Doc Hastings, a Republican, was torqued:
Our country is in the midst of a terrible economic recession and the federal government should not be taking actions that could stall vital transportation, infrastructure and energy projects that create new jobs. Shovel-ready projects in the trillion-dollar stimulus law could be delayed or halted by this action."5]
Go, Barrack. Yes we will be responsible for the precious and scarce natural resources we we joy today so our grandchildren can enjoy the same tomorrow.
Posted Here by
Terry Bankert 3/4/09
Consider continuing this discussion on face book.
http://www.facebook.com/people/Terry-Bankert/645845362
– SOURCES
1]
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/03/obama-species-m.html
2]
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-epa-speciesmar04,0,24501.story
3]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/03/AR2009030302620.html
4]
http://uk.reuters.com/article/americasRegulatoryNes/idUKN0350047520090303
5]
http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/environment/archives/163315.asp?from=blog_last3